<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Quotes on A Blog for the Uninitialized</title><link>https://www.nilpointer.blog/tags/quotes/</link><description>Recent content in Quotes on A Blog for the Uninitialized</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>&lt;a href="https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Licensed under Apache 2.0&lt;/a&gt;</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 13:48:08 -0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.nilpointer.blog/tags/quotes/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A thought on debugging</title><link>https://www.nilpointer.blog/posts/2026/02/a-thought-on-debugging/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 13:48:08 -0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.nilpointer.blog/posts/2026/02/a-thought-on-debugging/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Everyone knows that debugging is twice as hard as writing a program in the first place. So if you’re as clever as you can be when you write it, how will you ever debug it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Kernighan"
 
 
 target="_blank" 
 rel="noopener noreferrer"
 
&gt;Brian W. Kernighan&lt;/a&gt; is attributed to that quote, and it (regularly) reasonates a lot with me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think sometimes as engineers, we actually &lt;em&gt;like&lt;/em&gt; complexity. It feels fun to build something really interesting and technical in scope, and we often confuse simple topics like &amp;ldquo;simple&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;technical&amp;rdquo;, or even &amp;ldquo;beautiful&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;clean&amp;rdquo;, &amp;ldquo;elegant&amp;rdquo;&amp;hellip;the list goes on.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>