<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Github Actions on A Blog for the Uninitialized</title><link>https://www.nilpointer.blog/tags/github-actions/</link><description>Recent content in Github Actions on A Blog for the Uninitialized</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>&lt;a href="https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Licensed under Apache 2.0&lt;/a&gt;</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 20:18:15 -0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.nilpointer.blog/tags/github-actions/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>"Clever" Has No Place in CI</title><link>https://www.nilpointer.blog/posts/2026/02/clever-has-no-place-in-ci/</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2026 20:18:15 -0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.nilpointer.blog/posts/2026/02/clever-has-no-place-in-ci/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I wanted to share this separately on my site because, well, it made quite the impression over on &lt;a href="https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7406476989181628416"
 
 
 target="_blank" 
 rel="noopener noreferrer"
 
&gt;LinkedIn&lt;/a&gt;, where I initially posted it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hot take: the code used in infrastructure engineering shouldn&amp;rsquo;t be complicated, nor should it be clever. It actually should be rather dumb.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If something goes wrong, you want it to be with the code you&amp;rsquo;re trying to build or ship, not an unexpected effect of an overly complex CI system.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>